The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable local company lacking GHits of substance and with no GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:COMPANY. ttonyb (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am unable to locate any documents which would establish the notability of this company. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 19:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, unsourced. Hairhorn (talk) 22:45, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 22:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This company is notable in So. Cal. but without a lot of fanfare about themselves in the press and deserves to stay. I will add additional sources to their citations. It's a bitty, non-advertorial article about who they are and what they do. They get a lot of searches and should stay present here. Still working on getting better MuffledThud :-)BusinessBios ~~BusinessBios~~ —Preceding undated comment added 21:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]
This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.