The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I'd almost be tempted to suggest a no-context speedy delete, but I think the "blocks" of the title are apartment buildings, so there's the faintest inkling of context. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. No context, just a table. --Hirsutism (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Draftify: Block here refers to an administrative subdivision not apartment building. The article is not in a very good shape but the subject is certainly encyclopaedia worthy. Pratyush (talk) 17:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Simple table with no context. Ajf773 (talk) 23:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blocks with tables and no interlinks. Capitals00 (talk) 15:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Administration in Bihar. "Just a table" is not an argument for deletion (there are plenty of standalone lists), but I don't see any evidence that the blocks in Bihar have been discussed as a group (per WP:LISTN). Administration in Bihar is a natural redirect as it already mentions blocks as part of the administrative structure. Appable (talk | contributions) 04:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.