This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 06:44, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Boobert[edit]

At first glance this article seems like it just needs touched up, but this user (User:24.244.210.190) is also responsible for several junk articles, which brings the validity of this entry into question, especially since it's been vandalized several times by someone with a similar IP address. If this user wants to mess around they can use the sandbox. -- RPIRED 05:56, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This is not a valid article. I am the user at (User:24.244.210.190) and have been putting junk entries because it is an attack against me personally from the user who originally posted it, who uses a dialup provider. Boobert chase is not a real game, and Boobert is a mean nickname given to me by the orginal author. Boobert chase is not nor has it ever been real. I am not messing aroung, I am defending myself. I VOTE FOR THIS TO BE DELETED! - User:24.244.210.190 01:01, 11 FEB 2005 (EST)

• Delete Courtland 07:04, 2005 Feb 11 (UTC)
• Delete. Zero Google hits for "Boobert chase", and the modest number of Google hits for "Boobert" have nothing about a video game, just a few people out there using it as a nickname. Could be speedy deleted as patent nonsense hoax. -- Curps 08:38, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Hoax. Inter 13:40, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy as admitted hoax (see above). Also not on Google or KLOV just in case anyone had any doubt. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:04, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.