The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 04:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bordel ambiant[edit]

Bordel ambiant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:N and WP:RS. No sources given. Nothing written about it online. The group is also borderline when it comes to notability. I'll nominate it later if I cannot find anything substantial on it.


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LegoKontribsTalkM 04:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.