The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of near-parabolic comets#C/2016 M1. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

C/2016 M1 (PANSTARRS)[edit]

C/2016 M1 (PANSTARRS) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability guideline of WP:NASTRO with no noteworthy scientific coverage and studies according to NASA ADS. Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 03:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:39, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not seem notable. I assume that it is on the list of 2016 discovered objects. Gusfriend (talk) 06:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of near-parabolic comets § C/2016 M1, using ((NASTRO comment)) w/ linkage to wikidata:Q103824025.Rfassbind – talk 00:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.