The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 13:05, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CLNZ/NZSA Research Grants[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable grant program that fails WP:GNG. The provided sources are either in non-independent sources, non-reliable sources, or mention a winner of the award without significant discussion of the award itself. Citrivescence (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Citrivescence (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Citrivescence (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacking sources which will lead to failing WP:ORG, but some of it's writing style read more like a promotion. Sheldybett (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.