The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 23:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer Survivor Park[edit]

This article is about a park in Omaha that is really not notable, per the general notability guideline. From several searches of both Google and Google News, I can find no independent, reliable (or even unreliable) source that can satisfy the notability or verification policies. NW (Talk) 21:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of Nobility based on Ghits and Gnews. Also reads like an ad including a "why you should visit" section. --DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 10:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 01:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The history section indicates that the park is notable. -- 科学高爾夫迷 21:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think that you could explain, please? All I see in the history section is essentially that a man dying of cancer established the park, that there are sculptures in the parks, and that there are multiple such parks across the United States. I don't see how that establishes notability. NW (Talk) 22:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason to me that it just seems notable is because it began with a man battling cancer, and additionally, it has a lot of sculptures. -- 科学高爾夫迷 01:05, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no number of sculptures or status of founder can make it notable if there's no coverage. Nyttend (talk) 13:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.