The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. CitiCat ^♫ 03:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chimbudeven[edit]

Chimbudeven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)– (View log) Possible WP:COI only edit of creator and totally unreferenced since July 2006.Pharaoh of the Wizards 14:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep The multiple editors in the history have mitigated the COI in my opinion. (COI is not itself a sufficient reason to delete.) IMDb has him listed for directing one film in 2006 - not much, but better than nothing. Shalom ^Hello 17:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 18:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep as per Shalom. Requirs expanding and citations to prove its notability as per WP:BIO. Cocoma 13:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment During the deletion of Vikki Blows through there were 3 other sources in addition to IMDB.I was told IMDB was not enough further this COI.I feel for self created articles they should be clearly notable,this case clearly fails WP:BIO and WP:N [1]Pharaoh of the Wizards 12:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete - citations that establish notability do not exist at the moment. Girolamo Savonarola 20:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.