The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was NO CONSENSUS. JIP | Talk 15:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, can't see why anyone now or in future would be looking them up in an encyclopedia. Akradecki 14:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. No assertion is made of notability for this one-year old group. If verifiablesources can be cited for some media coverage, that might be different. Delete as is. Scorpiondollprincess 14:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cautious Keep. Editor has provided media cites. Should be checked out before decision is made. Richardjames444 18:23, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being well known in Montreal's lesbian community is hardly notable --RMHED 19:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.there are citation in the fr wiki about the notorious Goldensun 12:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.