The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chronotopos[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indexed pretty much nowhere, fails WP:NJOURNALS Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly move to "Draft", that would be an advisable proceeding. Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 14:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing to indicate that this would pass WP:NJOURNALS or WP:GNG. Sending to draft would be pointless because the article could not be developed to an acceptable state. A case of WP:TOOSOON at best. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NJOURNALS, it does not appear to be cited significantly or influential, too new to have historic importance. XVDC (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.