The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Goloubef[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur player who has yet to play professionally. Fails to meet WP:N or WP:ATHLETE. Can be recreated when/if he plays professionally or otherwise achieves notability. This level of player has been routinely deleted in the past. DJSasso (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. —DJSasso (talk) 15:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:ATHLETE and the notability standards of the hockey WikiProject; not particularly distinguished college player. Ravenswing 16:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, based on article. Comment I was curious. There are 38,900 hits on Google for this guy. Has his own fan club on Facebook even. And whoever put the article on Wikipedia can't write more than a stub. Alaney2k (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per above. Patken4 (talk) 23:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:ATHLETE. Joe Chill (talk) 00:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ATH as he hasn't played at the highest professional level.--Giants 27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 00:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.