The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colassoraptor[edit]

Colassoraptor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unless this is a misspelling, I can find no evidence that this article describes an actual dinosaur. JavaTenor 05:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Spam. The one sentence in the article even calls it a Cloassoraptor. Borderline patent nonsense. Only hit on google is this page. Similar spellings turn up no results. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 06:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. I googled every spelling I could think of, and I'm presuming this is a hoax unless someone finds evidence. Someguy1221 06:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, I'm not seeing anything on Google either. J Milburn 09:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete definitely needs sources. JJL 21:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoax Bigdaddy1981 03:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; no sources, fails WP:V; sounds like a hoax. *** Crotalus *** 16:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- Mailer Diablo 02:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.