The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copper L-aspartate[edit]

Copper L-aspartate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable nutritional supplement. The refs only support that it exists. The chemical-indexing leads to minimal database entries that do not have lit refs supporting notability. Heck, half the database entries don't even agree on the structure or formula (see my recent edit-summaries to it). The lack of notability applies to each possibility, the lack of specificity just makes the article that much more hopeless. DMacks (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the nomination and also per my previous nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L-Arginine Malate. This article was created to give legitimacy to this commercial website's product, not to document a notable supplement. ThemFromSpace 23:36, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As much as I like to see Wikipedia expanded with content about chemical compounds, I just don't see anything that suggests that this compound meets Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. ChemNerd (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.