The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete.Keegantalk 07:12, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable web producer. Jmlk17 04:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A self-employed person who I am sure does a good job, but all references are the subject's creations. Sjakkalle(Check!) 15:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well written article, mentioned on BBC, and Wired. 68.94.20.199 (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have a point there, and I retract my comment that all the references were the subjects creations. (Clearly I didn't read through the references thoroughly enough.) Still, I am not entirely sure if those brief mentions in a BBC program qualify for notability. Then again, I'm not entirely sure that it doesn't. Sjakkalle(Check!) 08:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The only one of the sources that seems to meet the reliable sources guideline is the short BBC piece; I'd really like to see at least one other significant source. The Wired ref seems kind of trivial to me, and doesn't really discuss him in a way that would verify much in the article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Short article, but seems to tick enough boxes to swing my vote. Just passes notability thanks to the BBC work and interview. 80.177.11.120 (talk) 03:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Not to affect my vote, but just noticed from checking his animation mix that I have seen his gifs used as avatars in countless forums. Means nothing I know, but interesting to finally find out where they came from...80.177.11.120 (talk) 03:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.