The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DXRC[edit]

DXRC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't want to repeat myself on this. The Station is clearly a hoax. Scrambling in my mind that GMA Network is not aware of this. The author must be warned again, or need to block him indefinitely. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 01:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - What evidence is there that this is a blatent hoax? I'll admit I'm vaguely confused by what comes up in google, but nothing pops out as obviously a hoax. Granted, it could be an attempt at subtle vandalism, which would suck, but I'm trying to find your arguments for it being a hoax and can't find them. Fieari (talk) 07:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If you take a good look at any sourced articles here on any site, I couldn't find anything regards to DXRC existence which actually does not. And if you're referring to GMA 7 website (which actually you don't yet know about anything on Philippine stations), there is no such thing as DXRC existence in Zamboanga province. The editor didn't cite any source since its creation. Hamham31Heke!KushKush! 00:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That might be a circular reference since it uses Wikipedia as one of their sources of information. Sixth of March 01:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article was created on 22 Jan 2016. The link I posted existed before that (see web archive). DXRC also seems to be mentioned here and here. Somehow I get a feeling this is not a blatant hoax. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:15, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.