The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dagan Books[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Publisher with no evidence of notability. Most sources appear to be primary or otherwise unreliable (i.e., blogs). Little significant coverage about the subject from third party WP:RS. Kinu ^t/_c 02:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom. Publisher was recently established and has only published one title. Other than primary sources, the only mentions are in passing as the publisher of such book - patitomr (talk) 23:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - They only formed in 2010 and have published one book. There's no coverage in reliable sources. - Whpq (talk) 16:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of reliable sources. Can always be recreated if it becomes more known. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 06:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in relible sources. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 17:04, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.