The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Wong[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR. Sources are all first party or youtube. Article also goes hand in hand with the spamming of articles to promote his book. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 11:42, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 11:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not enough secondaries out there to sufficiently pass WP:AUTHOR, overuse of peacock terms. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 11:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hindustanilanguage (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom. 199.168.146.146 (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2013 (UTC)— 199.168.146.146 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 12:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Numerous issues but the most concerning a lack of reliable sources to meet GNG. Mkdw ^talk 07:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.