The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:20, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Wiand[edit]

Dean Wiand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, does not meet GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Speedy Delete as it seems that the page creator blanked the page after the original PROD request which qualifies it for WP:CSD#G7. Technical 13 (talk) 01:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
information Administrator note I declined the CSD because the blanking occurred a very long time ago and other editors have edited the article since then. I think it would be best to let the AfD run its course. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.