The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Diversity consciousness[edit]

Diversity consciousness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the book this term is from may be notable, the neologism itself is not. The only references I can find are the sale descriptions at various online book sites (for the book where the neologism is described), and the author's blog (who also appears related to the author of this article). Singularity42 (talk) 19:10, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I posted these links here: http://diversityconsciousness.com/divconlinks.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bucherpa (talkcontribs) 18:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.