The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus and as a poorly sourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas M. Charles[edit]

Douglas M. Charles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article looks like a resume. It has no notability tag since 2009, and since then has not received any improvement in that aspect. —Fitoschido // Leave me a shout! 03:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per lack of notability. I didn't find any pertaining to him on both Yahoo and Google. SwisterTwister talk 07:43, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per same as above. There can't be a Wiki page for every professor -- and most have authored books. Cactusjump (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Miniscule cites on GS. Too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.