The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 03:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doxim[edit]

Doxim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article. No evidence or claim of notability, no RSes; literally all sources presently in the article are press releases. WP:BEFORE shows press releases and some churnalism based on them. There's not enough to pass WP:CORP. The article has been like this since its creation in 2011; there's no reasonable prospect of organic improvement. PROD removed with no effort to remedy problems. David Gerard (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.