The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 02:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drawloop[edit]

Drawloop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Drawloop (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) created the article)

Contested prod, apparently company-produced PR. Assertions of notability are made, but I don't believe this meets the threshold for WP:CORP, especially since references given are mainly self-published (i.e. blogs). RJASE1 ^Talk 20:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Blatant advertising, plus author's name is a clear WP:COI. Blueboy96 21:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original prodder, nonnotable, promotional in tone. NawlinWiki 21:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 02:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above. — Athaenara ✉ 04:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above--BozMo talk 14:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.