The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dtcon[edit]

Was tagged for speedy deletion for being "pure advertising," but that's not speediable. Brought it to AfD instead to respect the desire of the anon user who tagged it. No vote. howcheng {chat} 00:14, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Advert. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 00:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - FrancisTyers 00:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as ad -- Hansnesse 00:29, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable company, advertising --Quarl 00:36, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - it's an ad, not notable, not NPOV. — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 01:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non notable. Jobe6 02:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. -- NeoJustin 04:33, December 28, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn--MONGO 09:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.