The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It appears the subject passes WP:GNG while perhaps doesn't fulfill the requirements of WP:FOOTY. Keep in mind that FOOTY is a secondary notability guideline, and is only intended as a shortcut to estimate whether or not a subject is likely to pass GNG. Once it has been established that a subject does pass GNG, then the secondary notability guideline is no longer relevant. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 20:01, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eder Sarabia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played or managed in a WP:FPL. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 21:47, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.4meter4 (talk) 01:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this subject doesn't fail WP:GNG as has been significantly featured in MARCA and lots of other reputable sources that are reliable and independent. Just like the article of Rui Faria which was created because of his general notability, this article should be kept also. Ugochukwu75 (talk) 06:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ugochukwu75: Rui Faria's article have a good amount of coverage and references, plus he did manage in a WP:FPL with Al-Duhail. Two completely different situations. Aside of that, Sarabia's article doesn't even have the correct infobox. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BrazilianDude70: I can add more coverage to the article. Rui Faria's page was created in 2010 but he didn't manage a club in WP:FPL till 2019. A tag was already added to the page for improvements which I'm already doing. There are also other options like moving the article to draft space which could be done also. Ugochukwu75 (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:56, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to Manuel Sarabia? He is mentioned there, so... Geschichte (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No FPL involvement. No Great Shaker (talk) 03:52, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Manuel Sarabia as a reasonable WP:ATD Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes GNG, despite failing NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a Google search finds a lot of material supporting GNG in the last few days, and going back 5 years. Examples one, two ProQuest 2378452790, three. BEFORE fail. Nfitz (talk) 23:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 22:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes GNG - none of the articles used for references were trivial mentions of the subject. Though never managed any team in the WP:FPL, he was a notable assistant manager in two top Spanish teams, Real Betis and FC Barcelona and currently manages a third tier team, FC Andorra. Binaza (talk) 13:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG though fails WP:NFOOTY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.