The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:25, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ellylldan[edit]

Ellylldan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was previously deleted through proposed deletion, by myself. Later, an editor requested that the article be restored. I agreed to do so, but warned him that I would be bringing it to AfD immediately. There are no references to this article in any reliable sources, only pages like Myspace, Facebook, an entry on Last.fm (which merely shows that people have listened to the music), etc. Does not come close to meeting musician notability. -- Atama頭 16:49, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this article about a contemporary musical project. A search for sources shows that an article about a mythological goblin of the same name may be justified. This topic doesn't seem to be notable. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Self-made promotional pages on social networking sites (MySpace, Facebook, Last.FM, etc) do not establish notability. HillbillyGoat (talk) 04:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I can find no coverage whatsoever in independent reliable sources. For that matter, I really can't find any coverage in independent unreliable sources either. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Whpq. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 12:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.