The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:21, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Lin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The awards listed are not significant and well known. Does not meet WP:BASIC / WP:ENT. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Hmm.... I’m certainly not a proponent of the belief that awards = automatic notability but AVN and XBIZ are the so-called big awards in the industry. But if that’s her only claim to fame without independent reliable sources I say delete and refund if/when notability is actually met. Trillfendi (talk) 01:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Niche category award wins don't satisfy the "well-known and significant" standard of WP:PORNBIO. Can't pass WP:BASIC or WP:ENT without good secondary sources. • Gene93k (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is a lack of adequate sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete references provided are not satisfactory. Lapablo (talk) 15:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ACTOR, fails WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:16, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.