The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

FAQ (Finest Available Quality)[edit]

The result was Speedy Delete This is nothing more than an advertisement for an online t-shirt company, masquerading as an article. The related FA-Q was speedied yesterday. WP:SNOW also applies. Horologium (talk) 22:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A load of waffle about a not specially notable phrase. Guerrilla spam for a tee shirt brand. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or maybe I should say "DOA" and add that that means "delete or annihilate"). Ridiculous article. Yes, it's got footnotes, and do you know what they're for? To show the dictionary definition for the words "finest" (defined as 'better than most of its kind'") and "available" ("Defined as 'present and ready for use'") and "quality" (refer to the Wikipedia article Quality). I agree, it is spam for a forgettable T-shirt brand. Mandsford (talk) 02:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This article is advertising in disguise. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- advertising masquerading as a non-notable neologism masquerading as an article. Reyk _YO! 02:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This seems like some marketing firm trying to make a popular internet term and make it it's own. even if it is a notable phrase (which I highly doubt) the article is barely an expanded dictionary definition with little hope of ever being expanded upon. Deathawk (talk) 06:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, and also as the Finest Available Quality of Victor Sierra Charlie Alpha that I've seen in a while. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 13:03, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as a spammy mess. TN‑X-Man 13:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the term "Finest Available Quality" comprises a different array of concepts that, when assembled, convey ideas both of progress and pursuit of excellence. Use of the phrase "pursuit of excellence" ought to be a criterion for speedy deletion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete written like an advertisement and/or a personal essay. Aside from a link to the website for the brand, the only sources are dictionary definitions to the words "finest" and "available" , so the creator fails to grasp the idea of reliable sources. Created by a possible single use account. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 16:32, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete via WP:V and WP:N It reads like a magazine article --Numyht (talk) 17:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.