The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 15:07, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Biography that does not assert the importance of the individual; speedy delete declined. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete:WP:NOTE, meets CSD G6A7, thus should be speedied Sk8er5000 (talk) 21:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
G6 would only apply if no one at all would want to keep it. perhaps you are thinking of A7? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops! I did mean A7. -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 04:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is a sheik, and is connected with the other ruling elite in the country, although this is more revealed by what links here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ruling elite of which country? What did he rule? "What links here" only indicates that he was a son of a Minister, certainly not notable in and of itself. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Totally unsourced bio with no assertion of notability. The term sheikh is often an honorific that doesn't immediately assert notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.