The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 03:29, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fastroi[edit]

Fastroi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP. The one notable achievement is reaching the finals in a 2012 healthcare solution competition - from what I could pull from the source they did not win the competition. Aside from that, nothing notable is really provided in the article, making me think that the company simply isn't notable enough, or covered in reliable secondary sources enough, to have its own WP page. Comatmebro (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:01, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KTAP66 (talk) 05:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for the feedback. I am happy to provide additional content in the article right away, concerning the the significance of Fastroi. The company is the largest provider in its field; i.e. the market leader in Finland, and it has been growing fast; being one of the fastest growing technology companies in Finland for several years. So, I hope these additions (with third party references) will make the article better.

KTAP66 (talk) 06:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)About the healthcare soluton competition - the company won the Finnish heat, which is mentioned in the article now.[reply]

Dotzler71 (talk) 10:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)We are not looking to create a spam page. This is a legitimate and successful company with an existing wiki page in Finnish. The comments posted so far are very ambiguous, in that we cannot seemingly demonstrate our achievements or notability without being accused of spamming or self promotion. Instead of trying to delete the page out of hand without allowing the discussion to proceed, we would appreciate some guidance as to what it is specifically that the community is objecting to, so that we can remedy it and publish the page.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.