The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Previously CSD'ed, and still seems like an advert (see particularly the last sentence), with an un-notable subject. Nja247 07:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google is not the be-all and end-all of notability, but this is suggestive. No reason not to let it come back once reliable third-party sources have been provided. --Paularblaster 07:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Delete as spam. The material is a direct copy of their website and would need to be rewritten in its entirety to be encyclopedic and maintain a neutral point of view. Releasing the text under CC-by-SA doesn't make it not spam. -- Whpq (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.