The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. As a contested PROD, this is ineligible for soft deletion. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie Krainz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed PROD. Article does not appear to meet notability guideline under WP:BIO, particularly those outlined under WP:CREATIVE. The subject of the article is mentioned in a variety of 3rd party source in reference to the projects he has been associated with, but has not been the subject of any in depth coverage himself. Barkeep^{Chat | $} 18:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. according to IMDB has been screenwriter for 2 films with total estimated budget of $700k between them. Coverage of those would help here, but the only one to be released yet has apparently flopped. No reason to be on visual arts list. Johnbod (talk) 02:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment in light of the fact that this article has been sitting in AFD for almost three weeks with no votes for keep or deletion, and due to the fact that this was a failed PROD because the original author/WP:SPA simply removed the PROD without addressing or commenting on the proposed deletion, and that the original and primary author recently blanked the page can I suggest a deletion of this account without prejudice? Barkeep^{Chat | $} 18:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Barkeep plus my inability to find reliable, secondary sources providing significant coverage. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 23:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.