The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. What initially appeared to be an assertion of importance was not; Moore is the only artist of the genre, so he cannot qualify under WP:MUSIC as the most important artist of a notable genre. Accordingly, there are no assertions of importance in the article, and criterion A7 applies. —C.Fred (talk) 04:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Garrett Moore[edit]

Garrett Moore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable music performer; article's assertions of notability are not confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- No evidence of notability. No sources. Reads like a puff piece, which it probably is. Reyk _YO! 04:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. Notability not even close to being shown. Reads like a news release, probably a copy-and-paste. No sources at all, utterly fails WP:MUSIC. (I tagged this for speedy, which was declined.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.