The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Garuda fc ph[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources to show notability. -- $Σ talk contribs$ 02:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:07, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, exactly the same as an article that was previously deleted (via speedy), evidence. --Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me bro!} 12:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 14:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 14:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic, nonsense, vanity article. To begin with, the subject itself is not even notable. Keb25 (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, no significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. Deserter1 13:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable club. Argyle 4 Life^talk 15:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.