The result was delete. North America1000 08:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Not speedily deletable since there's an assertion of importance (some awards). However, the awards are from a minor trade association in a sub-discipline (not entirely trivial, but does not establish notability, just professional competence in one field), and a back-pat from his alumni association, which is entirely trivial. I thought about prodding it, but it's clear that the subject himself comes back as an anon periodically to "maintain" the page; it would likely just get re-created in different wording later.
I'm not finding anything usable in a Google news search on him. His name is mentioned fairly often in library-related sites and publications, but just as a citation attribution, or as the name of a co-editor of a resource they're pointing to (which is now part of Library Journal and owned by Media Source Inc., not by him and the partner). There's nothing I can find that is in-depth coverage of him, in multiple, independent, reliable sources. By way of comparison, I am not encyclopedically notable, yet I have more press coverage (actually about, not just mentioning, me) than this subject does, and I put out a book with a legit major publisher, and have friends and collaborators whose names I could drop as links that aren't red. Price clearly isn't notable either. This is a vanity article that has slipped through the cracks (didn't even have any cleanup templates on it, somehow) since August 2004. It's had over 14 years to turn into a proper article, and it's just not going to happen.
— SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:39, 3 December 2018 (UTC)