The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PeaceNT 04:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gay:trade.tv[edit]

Does not state notability. Google search for "Gay:Trade.tv" [1] returns 38 hits. Google search for links to "trade.tv" [2] returns zero hits. Google search for ""trade.tv" gay" [3] returns 740 hits. While google searches don't necessarily reflect notability, there's nothing here to assert it. SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no assertion of notability. Maybe under WP:CSD#A7. Carlosguitar 23:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- While I agree in principle (provisionally), A7 does not cover TV channels - there is not a 1-to-1 correspondence between TV channels and companies, and a TV channel is not a person, group of people, organisation, company, web content, etc etc. Remember that the criteria for speedy deletion are intended to be applied narrowly. SamBC(talk) 23:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's debatable whether G7 applies as SamBC notes, but by the time I untagged it (declining speedy) it was already here and the advantage of this process is that after it's gone (and I think that's a distinct possibility) G4 will apply in the future to speedy its reappearance if it makes one. Carlossuarez46 06:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.