The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Panagiotou[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:N. No secondary coverage of the only alleged notability (the TOSF), nothing on Google News or Books, web hits are incidental, authored by the subject, or Wikipedia mirrors. Unsourced for three years. I have my doubts about whether TOSF is notable, but even if it is, I don't find anything (secondary, independent, reliable) to base a separate article on subject on. Joe Decker (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in the absence of evidence that he passes any of the criteria of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:04, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 02:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. A closer look should be given to the articles on Telescopic Observations Strategic Framework (for which this subject is the only reference) and Telescopic Observations. Location (talk) 03:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.