The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:43, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Griffin Burns[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly declined at WP:AFC for its lack of reliable, verifiable, independent sources the author's skipped the AFC process & gone straight to mainspace. Delete for lack of reliable, verifiable, independent sources, lack of demonstrable notability, fails WP:NACTOR. Cabayi (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is too promotional.TH1980 (talk) 19:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:58, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of indepth coverage, fails WP:GNG, per nom. -- ferret (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.