The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hamish Rosser[edit]

Hamish Rosser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This nomination by 203.153.202.161 (talk) was incomplete. The edit summary says "shameless self promotion, does not meet WP:Notability". I'm not expressing any opinions myself. — Rankiri (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC,WP:BAND, has not had coverage from multiple notable independent sources. LK (talk) 19:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:N 203.153.202.218 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC). — 203.153.202.218 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'd suggest merge/delete if Rosser were only notable as a member of The Vines, but his involvement with Skinny Blonde adds another dimension. Article needs additional sources and clean-up if it stays.  florrie  08:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Plenty of sources are available. Agree with Florrie about the dual areas of notability.The-Pope (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even so, the article is filled with POV written by the subject, and those "sources" don't include the info presented here. 203.153.202.149 (talk) 01:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC) — 203.153.202.149 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Keep, member of a notable band, and quite a bit of controversy and coverage over the Skinny Blonde thing. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 22:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Being a member of a notable band or a controversial beer does not make this subject notable. See WP:N for notability standards. Sources listed are also not reliable, flat PR release without fact checking. 203.153.202.149 (talk) 01:29, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. There are multiple independent sources for Rosser, for instance this, this and this, all of which I was able to find in about thirty seconds. I'd suggest a little more time looking for sources and a little less time trying to delete articles would be in order. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

• 203.153.202.149/203.153.202.161/203.153.202.218: please forgive me for asking but have you considered registering? — Rankiri (talk) 01:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep member of notable band - independent verifiable references - may need to be re-written. Dan arndt (talk) 06:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable in his own right apart from The Vines as sources indicate. -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ ^ssnɔsıp 17:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have gone through and cleaned up some of the problematic areas of this article, added sources, tweaked grammar, etc. Article could still use some work but I think it is far from "delete-able". :-) -- ǝʌlǝʍʇ ǝuo-ʎʇuǝʍʇ ^ssnɔsıp 17:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.