- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Harvard International[edit]
- Harvard International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company. Cloudbound (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as simply none of this suggests even a minimally better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I googled them, looked for news, nothing there that I can see. They appear to be a licensing company, I've bought a product for which they own the brand name under UK license but they don't appear notable. Szzuk (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.