The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Aoidh (talk) 04:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Willetts[edit]

Helen Willetts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source eval table:
Comments Reference
In article
BBC is her employer, not IS RS 1. "BBC Weather: Helen Willetts". Retrieved 30 September 2018.
Primary, school record, not SIGCOV 2. ^ "Graduation 2007". University of Nottingham. 12 July 2007. Retrieved 15 June 2008.
BBC is her employer, not IS RS, not a notable award 3. ^ "Weather Presenter Award". BBC News. 9 March 2006. Retrieved 21 January 2008.
Mentioned above
Promo Why it's raining success for Helen in North Wales Weekly News - Thursday 18 May 1995;
Mention, not SIGCOV PLAYING THE EMPLOYMENT GAME in South Wales Echo - Monday 25 September 1995;
Autobiographical, not IS RS SIGCOV I'm JUST HELEN in Wales on Sunday - Sunday 05 January 1997;
BBC is her employer, not IS RS BBC profiles: [2] and [3]
BLPs need clearly IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.  // Timothy :: talk  20:52, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean by "Promo", it's a journalist reporting on the success of a weather presenter.
"Mention, not SIGCOV": The subsection is completely about her: includes her photo and biographical details.
"Autobiographical, not IS RS SIGCOV" It's a full-page feature in a national newspaper.
"BBC is her employer, not IS RS" She was employed by the Met Office, see for example https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/met-office-loses-bbc-contract-broadcaster-gives-no-reason-for-ending-100year-relationship-10468462.html Piecesofuk (talk) 09:28, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.