The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jclemens (talk) 00:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Homorazzi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website with no GNEWS and lacking GHits of substance. Appears to fail WP:WEB. ttonyb1 (talk) 03:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnotable blog site. Triplestop x3 14:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Despite thoughts on the website being unnotable, as a vancouverite, homorazzi's pivitol involvement in giving vancouver's LGBT community a public voice has been invaluable. As Vancouver's first LGBT blog and public forum, it truly deserves a spot on wiki as part of vancouver queer history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.6.0.216 (talk) 19:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 22:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.