The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ichpedia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was nominated for speedy deletion, something I'm uneasy with. Perhaps some Korean speakers could weigh in on the website linked as to what exactly this group is about and its significance? Ego White Tray (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The listings, inventories and encyclopedia of intangible cultural heritage are getting significant in Asian countries where tradition is endangered. Since the Ichpedia group is working for safeguarding ICH, it may be kept on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanheeh (talk • contribs) 11:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep UNESCO seems to be concerned about the issue, which supports Notability. Not sure why it was nommed for Delete, never mind Speedy.Listmeister (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep UNESCO is mentioned and the article is brand brand new so give it some time and see where it goes. ₪RicknAsia₪ 00:51, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.