The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - blatant first person advertising. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:34, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ieeca[edit]

Ieeca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability from reliable sources. However, a fundamental rewrite may make this keepable material. smileguy91^talk 23:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Wikipedia isn't the place for spam. Additionally, the article fails WP:ORGDEPTH. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 23:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.