The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:WITHDRAWN . (non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 01:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iland[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Using full name:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find any secondary sources to establish notability for this business. Joja lozzo 21:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that iland is not notable enough. I will work on collecting articles to demonstrate iland's notability and present them here. I am an iland employee, but no hard feelings if a consensus develops to delete the article. Damian (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm neutral about the company and look forward to seeing what reliable secondary sources we can come up with. Since you are an employee, I assume you may know of or can find out about independent news stories that Google isn't picking up. Let me know if you have any questions about notability or reliable sources. Joja lozzo 01:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some of the better ones I have found so far:

[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13], [14],[15],[16],[17],

There are a couple that are probably right on line of acceptable sources. I think most of them are pretty solid, though. Damian (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good start. It would be a big help if you would filter out the blogs and press releases and highlight the non-self-published sources. Thanks. Joja lozzo 21:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

None of them were press releases or self-published, I removed any articles that were in blog format:[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26] Damian (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is a good set of sources to establish notability. I don't know what you did to locate these (and would like to know if you care to share) but I very much appreciate the results and withdraw my proposal for AfD. Please use these sources to support the article content. Joja lozzo 23:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 23:31, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.