The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was already deleted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -This was already tagged for speedy deletion by User:Quanticle under G11 of the Criteria for speedy deletion, do you not think it would have been better to wait for the speedy to have been dealt with before opening this discussion? On another note your statement that the article fails WP:MOS is not a valid reason to open an article for deletion discussion. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 02:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, I know it is not a valid reason. I just put it there to prove that it is not wikified. Honest to goodness, I would have preferred an AfD rather than a speedy delete. Btilm 03:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Okay. I respect your opinion. I will leave the speedy delete tag on their and leave the choice up to an administrator. Btilm 03:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article appears to have been deleted. What do we do now? Warrah (talk) 14:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.