The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — xDanielxT/C\R 03:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Appears to be a non-notable software product. Ghits return several directory listings, but not much more. TN‑X-Man 14:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - there is this law.com article about the software, but that's all that coul dbve found aside from blog entries. If there were some more coverage about the software, then it would be a keep. -- Whpq (talk) 23:43, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find anything either. The law.com article was a good find, but even that does not go much in depth on this particular product. It's not much of an article at this point anyway.--Kubigula(talk) 03:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.