The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive Digital Technology[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged flagging notability issues since 2009. Joker264 (talk) 08:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.
Delete. A non-notable neologism whose scope is so vague (encompasses the underlying technology and skill sets used to make computer games) that no meaningful content could ever appear under this title that wouldn't belong someplace more specific. Look, Ma! I made a up a new TLA, and I did it all by myself! - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NEO. Nothing reliable and significant to back this term up. --Teancum (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Teancum. --Pnm (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.