The result was keep. The additional sources found are sufficient to justify this initially unlikely article. I assume it will be expanded with them, as promised in the discussion. DGG ( talk ) 00:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable bogus medical treatment "referenced" only to a deadlinked-page on a spammy website. Peacock (talk) 17:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]