The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jae Joseph[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BIO. All available sources are unreliable, given references are primary, press releases or dead links. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the ingredients include luxury branding firm, top brand strategists, lifestyle goods, brand management, popular blogs, featured famous personalities, notable shows, the editorial world, many high end luxury brands, leading clothing lines, favored by many celebrities: this is beautiful. -- Hoary (talk) 02:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (gossip) @ 20:48, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While I wholeheartedly agree with Hoary, I must !vote that this beautiful example of the genre Vanispamcruftisement be deleted due to lack of notability of its subject. There are a lot of references, but you don't have to dig too deeply into them to see that the WP:BIO notability criteria of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources have not been met. Of the two POSHGLAM.com sources cited, one is an insignificant little blurb about Joseph, and the other leads to an error message. The Haute Shot site is a "personal inspiration blog for all things awesome," and Joseph has a photo credit, but there's no coverage of him at all. The Wireimage.com link doesn't support the statement in the article that cites it. The tumblr citation is tumblr, so not independent or particularly reliable. The marketwire.com source is a press release that doesn't mention Joseph. The two reserveresult.com links are to guest blog posts that Joseph wrote, they're not about him. If this article survives the AfD, it needs a serious rewrite to remove peacocky puffery. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 18:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, I'm personally inspired sorry I mean persuaded by Dawn Bard's awesome argument. -- Hoary (talk) 10:34, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.