The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:51, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jago Punjab Party[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Political organisation. No significant coverage. Fails our notability threshold. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 04:54, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of importance as well as notability is not able to establish from the source(s) used under reference section as well as from the official website of the Election Commission of India. In fact it seems to be the case of WP:INHERITORG, where it came in news because of involvement in a event known as Jago Punjab Yatra. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 14:09, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Single event coverage which is not enough to pass notability. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 14:44, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's only 1 citation.[1] Not even mainly focused on this party. It was notable in 2010, but never after that? That's the main question, answer is that the party was never notable. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete My relatives live in Punjab and don't know about this party. No importance and notability. Fails. --Dhwanikaxoxo (talk) 23:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom not notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.